I do find the moon tricky to take pictures of. For one, it moves much faster than the stars (ever tried looking at it through a telescope? As soon as you find it, zip! it's gone). It also has a great deal of surface detail to capture. And it's actually really bright.
I hadn't tried taking pictures of the moon since I got my new zoom lens, and since there was a full moon the weekend before I went to Golden I figured I'd try it out while there was still lots to look at. I set my tripod up on the bike path on the main road next to my house (I'm sure the motorists thought I was very creepy), attached the hood to limit the light pollution from the street light I was standing under, zoomed as far as I could, tried to focus, and started testing out exposure times.
One of the first things I learned was that the moon does not need 20 seconds like stars do. I kept dialing back the time until I could make out craters and maria (the dark patches). Anywhere between 1/60 of a second and 1/320 of a second provided pretty good results. I had to crop some of the pictures to get the moon to the size I wanted it to be, but I was pretty happy with the final product.
1/60 second exposure |
(The large round crater near the bottom is called Tycho, for the Danish astronomer. FYI...)
1/320 second exposure - cropped |
You've heard the song about the "Man in the Moon" right? Well, that's because some people think they can see a face in these dark patches on the moon. I've taken the liberty of connecting the dots on what I think they are refering too...
1/200 of a second |
I learned in a random side note in a History class I took at University from a prof who also taught History of Astronomy (he was a cool dude) that the Chinese had a different idea of the image presented in the moon... Apparently to them it is a rabbit with some kind of cooking pot...
Peter Rabbit? Maybe. |
Maybe....
Skull in the Moon. |
No comments:
Post a Comment